Share |

On-Line Open Houses Inform and Engage Between Project Milestones

The city of Eugene, Oregon, has been working its way through the process of planning for future growth over the past 20 months, using various public engagement tools.  Early on, it became evident that we would need new and different media formats to inform and engage people at different points in the process.   For major public conversations such as creating a community vision, we held large workshops with plenty of opportunities for small group discussion.  For feedback on interim staff proposals, we have used surveys, on-line comment forms, and meetings with community groups.  Throughout the process, staff has maintained a Facebook page and comprehensive website with current project videos, maps, and documents posted as they are developed.

Between major project milestones, significant progress is being made on the technical front, but there isn’t a lot of reason for people to come to a large public meeting.  Enter the On-Line Open House.

With embedded videos, posters, and accompanying text, visitors have access to all of the information that traditionally is available at a physical meeting.  Each page features a comment link that ties back to the specific page where the comment originated, allowing staff to easily match a comment to the content.

Multi-Family/Commercial Lands Need from COE Planning Division on Vimeo.

When researching the use of on-line open houses, we found the most comparable use of the method was for major transportation projects like the Sellwood Bridge project in Portland.  Approximately 2,700 visitors used this tool over a period of twelve days!  Compare that to the average public meeting attendance of 80-100 for this project, and it’s clear the format is a keeper. Preliminary numbers for Envision Eugene show that in the first month, over 200 visitors stopped by on-line.  Physical open houses draw anywhere from 10-100 people depending on the topic and stage of the process. 

Planners are using the on-line open house to share information on each of the land uses that Envision Eugene is planning to accommodate. Maps depict places inside the existing Urban Growth Boundary where additional homes, businesses, and industrial employers could locate under existing zoning, and where we want to increase our redevelopment efforts to add more housing options and mixed use development to the community.  The redevelopment vision is focused on our key transit corridors and core commercial areas.  The on-line videos feature recognizable places and businesses from around the community, allowing the public to relate the concepts under discussion to their favorite places on the ground.

This on-line method of doing the Open House is very convenient and very helpful.  Well –laid out, and easy to download very detailed pdf maps so we could zoom in and still see everything with great detail. I hope other City open houses can be presented this way. THANKS!

Feedback from one appreciative citizen.

If we keep getting comments like the one below, the City will surely be devoting more of our in-house resources to designing easy and fun tools to access planning project information on-line.

Learn more about Envision Eugene's On-Line Open House >>

NOTE: The on-line open house was designed and created by staff member Kayre Axe.  Videos by intern Mary Heberling.


Comments

One could argue opinions endlessly, but it helps to start with some facts. So ... I would challenge Terri Harding, who has done an exceptional job maintaining a positive image for Envision Eugene, to provide three bits of information for folks who may be following this blog:

  • An enumeration of the commitments for major deliverables made by the City Manager and/or posted on the "Envision Eugene" calendar since April 2010 -- and the actual date when the deliverable was delivered. (For example, if I recall correctly, the City Manager promised City Council "lines on a map" (for the UGB) would be delivered in February 2011, yet to-date the Council is still waiting for this map.)
  • A list of the significant, concrete items agreed upon by the Envision Eugene "Citizen Resource Group", which met for endless days of "listening sessions". (Having been a member of the CRG, and the chair of one of the CRG committees, I don't recall any CRG agreement on a significant, concrete item.)
  • A list of the non-staff individuals, and their affiliations, who are active contributors to the current decision-making process. (From information on the City's Envision Eugene website and webcast recordings of City Council work sessions, it appears the "Technical Resource Group" are the only individuals who are actively involved in providing significant, informed public input.)

I would be happy for Terri to poroduce evidence to show my conclusions are wrong; but, as far as I can tell, Envision Eugene has an abysmal record of meeting commitments, wasted months and produced nothing of consequence from the CRG, and has devolved to the point where a tiny group of "insiders" (i.e., from narrow advocacy groups) are the only influential source of public input.

Waiting ... waiting ... waiting ...

Thanks Paul,
I would be more than happy to speak with you directly about your concerns. The city has learned considerably from your criticism in the past and we continue to do so. I hope planners looking to learn something from Eugene's experience can take something from your comments, as well as from the other published opinions and news articles I referenced.
Terri

The Envision Eugene process is a very successful public relations "snow job," but is by no means a legitimate or effective public process.

For a more honest appraisal, see the "No Vision in Envision Eugene" article on page 4 of the Fall 2011 issue (Vol. 10 Nbr.2) of the Land Watch Lane County newsletter, on-line at:
http://www.landwatch.net/files/Newsletter_10_2_Fall_2011.pdf

Paul Conte, Chair
Jefferson Westside Neigbors
2010 Eugene Neighborhood of the Year
2011 National Neighborhood of the Year Finalist